Trends in Development Investment in Birmingham
Published: April 2000
This report identifies the progress Birmingham has made in seeking to raise levels of development
investment in the last decade and benchmarks investment in Birmingham
against a number of comparator cities in the UK.
The key findings from this report form the basis of Chapter
Six in the 1999 Economic Review produced by BEIC.
The primary source of data for this report is the CREDO database
of Development Investment and Company Relocations managed by
Prism Research Ltd. A study of the industrial building stock
in Birmingham by Grimley Property Advisers is also utilised.
Context
- Development investment encompasses all new building, extension and refurbishment
activity.
- During the period 1991-1998 there were 1,389 development
investment projects in Birmingham that each exceeded a value
of £50,000. They generated a total of £2,455 million
investment in the City.
- Local development investment during this period has been concentrated
in housing and roads and highways development.
Key Sectors
- The report focuses on six key sectors (industry, warehousing,
retail, offices, tourism and recreation) and compares the level
of development investment per capita in twelve UK cities.
- Birmingham performs worst out of the twelve with development
investment per capita in Manchester and Newcastle over four times
the value of investment in Birmingham.
- The industrial sector is one of the most important generators of growth
but Birmingham ranks only ninth in terms of industrial investment
per capita. This may reflect a relatively low availability of sites
and premises for industrial development.
- Birmingham also has a poor recod in terms of office development
with less than a quarter of the value of office investment per
capita recorded in Newcastle or Manchester.
- The report concludes that despite increases in development
investment in Birmingham the City continues to lag behind comparable
cities in the UK. This may be because other cities are proving
to be much more competitive in terms of attracting inward investment
and development activity, or it may be that there are supply
constraints (such as a lack of suitable sites or premises) in
Birmingham that are preventing development investment occurring
on the same scale as elsewhere.
|